Ben Carson Spent $31,000 of Taxpayer Money on a Dining Set for His HUD Office.

← all posts

The dining set story is not the most significant thing that happened under Carson's leadership at HUD — which included rolling back fair housing regulations, weakening protections against discrimination, and reducing funding for housing assistance programs. But it is the most vivid illustration of a pattern that ran through the Trump cabinet: people appointed to run agencies whose missions they were ideologically opposed to, who treated their offices as personal amenities while cutting the programs those offices were supposed to serve.

What Happened.
In 2017, HUD ordered a custom dining room set for the secretary's office suite at a cost of $31,561. The purchase was made from HUD's "nonrecurring expenses" fund, which has a $5,000 legal limit per transaction under the Antideficiency Act — the same law that the GAO found Scott Pruitt violated with his EPA soundproof phone booth. Spending above that limit requires congressional notification and approval.

Helen Foster, HUD's chief administrative officer, raised objections to the purchase and said she was told by a Carson aide that the secretary and his wife both wanted the furniture. Foster later filed a whistleblower complaint saying she was demoted after refusing to approve spending that exceeded legal limits. Her complaint stated she was told to find a way to redo the budget to accommodate the furniture purchase and that when she declined, she was reassigned. The HUD Inspector General investigated.

Carson's Explanation.

Carson initially said he was unaware of the furniture purchase. He then acknowledged it, saying he and his wife had requested a small table and chairs to accommodate meetings in their dining room suite and that the order had "gotten carried away." He later said his wife Candy had been the one who had handled the furniture selection process and that he had not been aware of the final cost. Neither explanation fully accounted for why the purchase exceeded the legal limit by more than six times or what happened to the employee who tried to stop it.

The dining set was eventually cancelled and HUD said it would not proceed with the order. Carson was not removed from his position and faced no formal legal consequences. Helen Foster received an undisclosed settlement on her whistleblower complaint. Carson served as HUD Secretary for Trump's entire first term and was not nominated for a second-term cabinet position.

Verification note

The $31,561 figure and $5,000 legal limit are from contemporaneous reporting by ProPublica and the Washington Post, corroborated by HUD records and the HUD Inspector General investigation. Helen Foster's whistleblower complaint is a matter of public record, filed with the Office of Special Counsel. Carson's public statements are from press conferences and congressional testimony. The Antideficiency Act provisions are federal law.

The Sources

ProPublica, February 2018 — original reporting on $31,561 dining set; HUD records reviewed.
Washington Post — follow-up reporting on Helen Foster whistleblower complaint and demotion.
Helen Foster whistleblower complaint — Office of Special Counsel; public record.
HUD Inspector General investigation — 2018; findings reported by multiple outlets.
Carson congressional testimony — responses to questions about furniture purchase; Congressional Record.

Carson Spent $31K on a Dining Set. The Legal Limit Was $5K. Employee Who Objected Was Demoted.

Carson's Explanation.